DemandHunt Demand signals from global communities
EN
Lifestyle, Health & Hardware Webapps Stack Exchange · 2024-12-10

Browse the words 'next to' an entry: Wiktionary has no alphabetical browsing

想查『字典里左右页的词』:Wiktionary 没有按字母序浏览

At a glance · 30-second read
  • WhoWebapps Stack Exchange · 2024-12-10 · 1 upvotes · 1 replies
  • The askBrowse the words 'next to' an entry: Wiktionary has no alphabetical browsing
  • The openingA dictionary browser: build an alphabetical index from Wiktionary dumps with nearby-word browsing, as a site or app.

What was actually said

“Wiktionary lacks printed-dictionary-style 'nearby words' — handy when you half-remember a spelling or want same-family words.”

— Webapps Stack Exchange · 2024-12-10 · webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/179969/how-to-li…

Background and pain

The pain

You half-remember a spelling but search is all-or-nothing; there's no 'flip to the page and look around'.

A buildable angle

The opening

A dictionary browser: build an alphabetical index from Wiktionary dumps with nearby-word browsing, as a site or app.

How to validate it

  1. Read the whole thread and note the recurring scenarios — repetition is the density of the need.
  2. Search existing tools around "dictionary / learning" and check which single step they actually cover.
  3. Put up a one-line landing page, share it back to Webapps Stack Exchange, and see whether anyone asks about pricing.

Existing options

Wiktionary 搜索纸质词典

From the thread · top comments

The only way to do this that I've found is to use the category "English lemmas" , which apparently lists all pages having English words. Using this directly will work, but navigation is annoyingly clumsy. First you scroll down to a table of single letters and of two-letter combinations, and click on one of them. That takes you to a page of the category which includes 200 English words, beginning with words starting with that letter or those letters. Then you can scroll down past the navigation table to a section listing the words. Often that doesn't get you close enough to your target word, so

— mgkrebbs · ▲ 0
Open the source thread

More threads on this pain

Related opportunities